Yes!! They had the opportunity to do SO much good here, and instead, they've done harm. How how HOW could they write an article about (peri)menopause without mentioning HRT? The writer should have included it, especially as a woman. And if she didn't, the copy/research desk for sure should have noted it as an omission during review.

I'm just confounded here, and while I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek with my invitation to serve as a case study for their follow-up piece, I actually do hope they write one.

Try to undo some of the harm...